Fri 25 Jul 2008
Fri 25 Jul 2008
Truman Show Disorder: “Montreal psychiatrists Joel and Ian Gold are studying the Truman Show Delusion, a mental illness they’ve identified where individuals are convinced that they are the stars of imaginary reality TV shows. By the way some people act on Flickr and YouTube, I’d say that this disorder, with varying severity, may be more common than we realize. From Canada.com:
While (Joel) Gold says they could have easily called their new disorder the EDtv Delusion or the Matrix Delusion — both films that refer to an unreal existence– three of the five patients he treated at the storied mental health hospital directly likened their plight to The Truman Show, the 1998 film about Truman Burbank, an affable suburbanite who slowly becomes aware that his every movement is broadcast 24/7 to voyeuristic viewers around the world.
The five patients Dr. Gold treated were white men between the ages of 25 and 34, the majority of whom held university degrees. ‘I realized that I was and am the centre, the focus of attention by millions and millions of people,’ explained one patient, an army veteran who came from an upper-middle-class upbringing.
‘My family and everyone I knew were and are actors in a script, a charade whose entire purpose is to make me the focus of the world’s attention….’
‘The wish for fame is a form of grandiosity, and the fear of threats such as surveillance can bring about paranoia,’ said the Montreal-based (Ian) Gold, 46, who specializes in delusion.
‘New media is opening up vast social spaces that might be interacting with psychological processes.’
Truman Show Delusion (Canada.com, thanks Lyn Jeffery!)
“
(Via Boing Boing.)
Fri 25 Jul 2008
Andrew Keen:: ”

‘[…] A Luddite argument is one in which some broadly useful technology is opposed on the grounds that it will discomfit the people who benefit from the inefficiency the technology destroys. An argument is especially Luddite if the discomfort of the newly challenged professionals is presented as a general social crisis, rather than as trouble for a special interest. (“How will we know what to listen to without record store clerks!”) When the music industry suggests that the prices of music should continue to be inflated, to preserve the industry as we have known it, that is a Luddite argument, as is the suggestion that Google pay reparations to newspapers or the phone company’s opposition to VoIP undermining their ability to profit from older ways of making phone calls.
This is what makes Keen’s argument a Luddite one — he doesn’t oppose all uses of technology, just ones that destroy older ways of doing things. In his view, the internet does not need to undermine the primacy of the copy as the anchor for both filtering and profitability.
But Keen is wrong. What the internet does is move data from point A to B, but what it is for is empowerment. Using the internet without putting new capabilities into the hands of its users (who are, by definition, amateurs in most things they can now do) would be like using a mechanical loom and not lowering the cost of buying a coat — possible, but utterly beside the point.

The internet’s output is data, but its product is freedom, lots and lots of freedom. Freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of association, the freedom of an unprecedented number of people to say absolutely anything they like at any time, with the reasonable expectation that those utterances will be globally available, broadly discoverable at no cost, and preserved for far longer than most utterances are, and possibly forever.
Keen is right in understanding that this massive supply-side shock to freedom will destabilize and in some cases destroy a number of older social institutions. He is wrong in believing that there is some third way — lets deploy the internet, but not use it to increase the freedom of amateurs to do as they like.
It is possible to want a society in which new technology doesn’t demolish traditional ways of doing things. It is not possible to hold this view without being a Luddite, however. That view — incumbents should wield veto-power over adoption of tools they dislike, no matter the positive effects for the citizenry — is the core of Luddism, then and now.’ From Andrew Keen: Rescuing ‘Luddite’ from the Luddites [posted by Clay Shirky on Many-to-Many]. Also see ‘The internet’s output is data, but its product is freedom’.
“
(Via networked_performance.)
Thu 24 Jul 2008
Rad.
Mon 7 Jul 2008
Thu 3 Jul 2008
Here is an interesting study about the positive benefits of caffeine on the liver, even reducing the risk of cirrhosis by up to 80% (if you drink 4 cups of coffee per day). The study was huge, following more than 125,000 people for an average of 14 years.
Wed 2 Jul 2008
For some reason, my jailbroken iPhone has never played nice with iPhoto or iView Media Pro for downloading photos from the camera, I have just relied on command line scp or finder based afp sharing to get the images off my phone, and to delete them.
But today, I crossed a new threshold, I have shot more than 1000 photos with my iPhone, so a new directory appeared in my /var/mobile/Media/DCIM/ directory, it is 101APPLE/ which just starts the IMG_0001.jpg counting over again. I didn’t want the camera to become confused, so I deleted both 100APPLE & 101APPLE hoping the phone would just create a new directory. Well, it wasn’t so smooth, a new directory didn’t appear, and adding my own, and doing some chmod experiments also failed (new photos simply went off into space, not saved, not accessible).
I was almost ready to freak out. Then success!: just rm -r the whole DCIM/ directory, the phone will then handle the creation of a new structure just fine. phew!
also, just look at this cute thing:
Tue 1 Jul 2008
- related post - musical choo choo
Mon 30 Jun 2008
What does it mean that English, and other subject-verb-object languages, might have veered off-course from the dominant (hard wired? or simply ancient?) subject-object-verb model? A recent study shows that despite one’s native linguistic model, non-verbal communication will follow the subject-object-verb format, both gesturally, and diagrammatically. Basically, when people try to communicate with just their hands, they will create “sentences” following the “mice cheese eat” model even if their spoken language would follow a “mice eat cheese” format. The study seems to indicate that the English model is a variant of something more automatic. Why would this kind of change happen?
Could this “promotion” of the verb (and the subsequent “demotion” of the subject) be tied to a cultural deficiency in empathy, our imperialist tendencies or even the rise of individualism? The latter being specifically an effect of object/subject polarization. This same polarization can also be tied to differences between Eastern and Western perceptions of “subject in context” images. The Western description being along the lines of, “a fish in a pond”, while the Eastern version would be more like, “a pond with a fish”.
I guess this still leaves us short when it comes to unravelling Master Yoda’s verb-object-subject format, or whatever he does.
Mon 30 Jun 2008
Mon 30 Jun 2008
Another piece from Yuri Suzuki
Mon 30 Jun 2008
After noticing NYC’s new Ride the City site, I rediscovered bycycle.org for bike route mapping in Portland. To celebrate, I’ve created a little route from Pirate Island to Pirate Town, enjoy the summer by bike!
Mon 30 Jun 2008
Designer/musician Yuri Suzuki’s “Sound Chaser” is a fantastically fun mixture of retro nostalgia wrapped in a sleek minimalist package. I’d be really curious to see the track pieces up close, to see how they connect. The other interesting thing that isn’t apparent form the video is that any “left” turns will be playing audio in reverse, enabling a possible “scratching” effect if the track bits were short enough.
Proposal: Yuri Suzuki + Christain Marclay + Tyco
![]() |
|
| Sound Chaser 2008 | Technical collaboration with Yaroslav Tencer |
| A train-style record player. Users connect the chipped pieces of records together to make new tracks. The records pieces are from cheap records bought at jumble sales or used record shops. This record player revives forgotten, old records. |
He’s also got lots of other great work here
– related post — trains that don’t stop
Wed 25 Jun 2008
If someone lives actively in the two cultures of their bilingual repertoire, they gain the added possibility of hosting divergent (not really independent) personalities. This doesn’t really come as much of a surprise to me though. I wrote a paper years ago showing dramatic personality shifts from relationship to relationship, interaction to interaction, proposing a model that would define individual names to each relationship a person had, a hybrid being comprised of both parties’ traits, needs and expectations.
If someone acts and feels and responds differently when they are in different situations, does that make them a different person? Is their interaction with you any less or more valid? At what threshold of difference would we declare them to be a fully different person ready for psychiatric help?
the link: How switching language can change your personality - being-human - 25 June 2008 - New Scientist
Wed 25 Jun 2008
A new study points out the possibility that the universe might spiral out and out and out to much farther reaches than conventional models. The fractal nature of this model could also be thought of as some kind of optical illusion, or quantum mirroring effect, where a small handful of galaxies are replicated infinitely across space, relying on the existence of an observer.
Mon 23 Jun 2008
Thinking through a way to fund a free web domain service for art projects. Maybe grant funded and limited to social practices kinds of work, or perhaps a partnership with a registrar/hosting service that acts like a gateway drug?
Or actually, imagine a speculation based service: you get free domains for a year, but the service actually owns the domain, at the end of the year, if the project is going well, you will pay a higher fee to buy the domain from the service.
The service watches stats/traffic on that domain and determines price based on that value.
It’s not even really the issue of paying for a new domain with each idea, it’s the hassle of the process. Maybe a prepaid bundle of domains would be a better way to think about this? Some service offers you domains by the dozen, for cheap, you prepay, and can create/get those dozen in any quantity at any time over the established time period. Like all pre pay models, part of the sustainability of this would be the assumption that not all prepaid domains would be claimed/used.
I simply think more artists need to be on the web, doing work that works well with the web.