<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Loosely Assembled &#187; individualism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://0009.org/blog/tag/individualism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://0009.org/blog</link>
	<description>lurking around the margins of binary dualism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2011 03:24:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The role of linguistics in the rise of individualism</title>
		<link>http://0009.org/blog/2008/06/30/the-role-of-linguistics-in-the-rise-of-individualism/</link>
		<comments>http://0009.org/blog/2008/06/30/the-role-of-linguistics-in-the-rise-of-individualism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 06:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fekaylius</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[inputs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9>∞]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[individualism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linguistics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://0009.org/blog/index.php/2008/06/30/the-role-of-linguistics-in-the-rise-of-individualism/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What does it mean that English, and other subject-verb-object languages, might have veered off-course from the dominant (hard wired? or simply ancient?) subject-object-verb model?  A recent study shows that despite one&#8217;s native linguistic model, non-verbal communication will follow the subject-object-verb format, both gesturally, and diagrammatically.  Basically, when people try to communicate with just [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://0009.org/blog/2009/03/26/the-constraints-of-counting-and-other-segmentation-constructs/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: The Constraints of Counting, and Other Segmentation Constructs'>The Constraints of Counting, and Other Segmentation Constructs</a></li>
<li><a href='http://0009.org/blog/2008/10/13/object-linguistics/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Object Linguistics'>Object Linguistics</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does it mean that English, and other subject-verb-object languages, might have veered off-course from the dominant (hard wired? or simply ancient?) subject-object-verb model?  A <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/channel/being-human/dn14228-charades-reveals-a-universal-sentence-structure.html?feedId=online-news_rss20">recent study</a> shows that despite one&#8217;s native linguistic model, non-verbal communication will follow the subject-object-verb format, both gesturally, and diagrammatically.  Basically, when people try to communicate with just their hands, they will create &#8220;sentences&#8221; following the &#8220;mice cheese eat&#8221; model even if their spoken language would follow a &#8220;mice eat cheese&#8221; format. The study seems to indicate that the English model is a variant of something more automatic.  Why would this kind of change happen? </p>
<p>Could this &#8220;promotion&#8221; of the verb (and the subsequent &#8220;demotion&#8221; of the subject) be tied to a cultural deficiency in empathy, our imperialist tendencies or even the rise of individualism?  The latter being specifically an effect of object/subject polarization. This same polarization can also be tied to differences between Eastern and Western perceptions of &#8220;subject in context&#8221; images.  The Western description being along the lines of, &#8220;a fish in a pond&#8221;, while the Eastern version would be more like, &#8220;a pond with a fish&#8221;.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/deep_shot/2207652716/"><img style="border:1px solid silver;padding:8px 8px 20px 8px;" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2365/2207652716_f201e27248.jpg?v=0"></a></p>
<p>I guess this still leaves us short when it comes to unravelling Master Yoda&#8217;s verb-object-subject format, or <a href="http://www.yodajeff.com/pages/talk/yodish.shtml">whatever he does</a>. </p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://0009.org/blog/2009/03/26/the-constraints-of-counting-and-other-segmentation-constructs/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: The Constraints of Counting, and Other Segmentation Constructs'>The Constraints of Counting, and Other Segmentation Constructs</a></li>
<li><a href='http://0009.org/blog/2008/10/13/object-linguistics/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Object Linguistics'>Object Linguistics</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://0009.org/blog/2008/06/30/the-role-of-linguistics-in-the-rise-of-individualism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

